February
1, 2001
IN AMERICA
Dead Wrong
By BOB HERBERT
Darby
Tillis spoke briefly at a press
conference on steps of City Hall in Lower
Manhattan last week, which was
remarkable. He was supposed to have been
strapped to a gurney and executed by an
injection of poison years ago. It turns
out he was innocent. But that didn't
become clear to the authorities until he
had spent nine long, debilitating years
on death row in Illinois.
It's a crapshoot if you're condemned
by the government to die and you happen
to be innocent a crapshoot with
tremendously long odds. You may convince
some court of your innocence on appeal.
Most likely you won't.
Watching Mr. Tillis was a little like
watching a ghost. He stood stoically in a
bitter cold wind coming off the East
River. He spoke directly to the bank of
television cameras arrayed before him.
"The death penalty is too
final," he said. "It is dead
wrong."
The press conference preceded a
hearing before the City Council on a
resolution calling for an indefinite
moratorium on the death penalty in the
state of New York. The hearing and the
resolution were not just ceremonial. They
were part of a growing campaign to bring
a halt to executions across the country
because of the arbitrary and unfair ways
in which the death penalty is
administered, and because of the great
potential for terrible mistakes to be
made.
Four years ago the American Bar
Association said executions should be
stopped until a greater degree of
fairness and due process could be
achieved. Last year the governor of
Illinois, George Ryan, declared a
moratorium in his state, citing the
exoneration of 13 death row inmates since
1977. And dozens of municipalities have
approved non-binding resolutions, similar
to the proposal in the New York City
Council, urging their states to declare
death penalty moratoriums.
Wariness about the death penalty has
steadily increased as more and more
becomes known about the treacherous ways
in which it is imposed. Even staunch
supporters of capital punishment are
expressing concern about the execution of
individuals whose lawyers were
incompetent or slept through long
portions of their trials; or prisoners so
mentally deficient they asked to save
portions of their final meals until
later; or especially those
individuals who might in fact have been
innocent.
Death penalty advocates, conditioned
to overwhelming public support for
capital punishment, have been surprised,
if not astonished, by some of the
national polling data that has come in
over the past several months. Two
separate polls have shown that nearly
two-thirds of Americans favor a
suspension of the death penalty until
issues about the fairness of its
application can be resolved.
And a CNN/USA Today/Gallup Poll taken
last June showed that only a slender
majority 51 percent believe
the death penalty is applied fairly.
According to that poll, 80 percent of
Americans believe an innocent person has
been executed in the U.S. in the past
five years.
"Support for the moratorium is
based on a growing recognition that there
are widespread, systemic problems that
undermine any confidence that the death
penalty in this country is imposed
reliably, fairly or justly," said
Elaine Jones, president of the NAACP
Legal Defense and Educational Fund, who
testified at the New York City Council
hearing.
"The costs of prosecuting capital
cases are enormous," she said,
"diverting much-needed funds from
other law enforcement and crime
prevention programs in pursuit of a
penalty that has never been shown to have
a deterrent effect."
Anthony Amsterdam, a New York
University law professor who has been a
leading death-penalty defense lawyer for
three decades, said he believed there was
no way to really make the death penalty
work. "You can't do it by being
super-scrupulous about legal
procedures," he said, "because
what happens is that you winnow it down
to a very few people, and you get 20-year
waits on death row and incredible
expenditures."
But if you don't do that, he said,
"you increase the likelihood of
killing people who are innocent."
The death penalty is outlawed in most
civilized countries. The more vigorously
it is applied in the U.S., the more its
support among Americans diminishes. It's
an idea whose time has gone.