| Copyright New York Times Company Apr 21, 2005
When a Spanish-speaking hospital receptionist refused to interpret
during her lunch hour, doctors at St. Vincent's Staten Island Hospital
turned to a 7-year-old child to tell their patient, an injured
construction worker, that he needed an emergency amputation.
With no one to bridge the language gap for another patient, a newly
pregnant immigrant from Mexico with life-threatening complications,
doctors pressed her to sign a consent form in English for emergency
surgery. Understanding that the surgery was needed ''to save the baby,''
the young married woman awoke to learn that the operation had instead left
her childless and sterile.
Those cases were among dozens detailed in a civil rights complaint
contending that the lack of basic translation services at St. Vincent's
and three other New York City hospitals endangers their immigrant patients
and violates state and federal law.
The complaint, to be formally submitted today to the New York attorney
general, Eliot Spitzer, was compiled by a coalition of advocates for
immigrants who spent two years surveying patients, monitoring area
hospitals and pressing for the translation services required by laws
against discrimination on the basis of national origin.
Juanita Scarlett, a spokeswoman for Mr. Spitzer, said the attorney
general's office was already conducting an inquiry into language barriers
at the four hospitals, which besides St. Vincent's include the Flushing
and Jamaica Hospital Medical Centers in Queens and Brookdale University
Hospital and Medical Center in Brooklyn.
''We're greatly concerned that the health care needs of patients with
limited English proficiency are not being met,'' Ms. Scarlett said.
Citing privacy rules, Michael Fagan, a spokesman for St. Vincent's,
would say nothing about individual cases. But he said that because of
meetings with immigrant advocacy groups, the hospital had made hiring
bilingual employees a priority, and that last year, 17 obtained
interpreter credentials.
Adam Gurvitch, director of health advocacy for the New York Immigration
Coalition, which coordinated the efforts to document language barriers,
called the civil rights complaint a last resort. ''We feel like we've hit
a wall,'' he said.
Other hospitals approached about the translation problem were far more
responsive than the four private hospitals named in the complaint, he
added, and some, like the city-run Elmhurst Hospital Center, have become
models of health care access for immigrants, in part by training their
multilingual employees to serve as interpreters.
Though more than 150 tongues are now spoken in New York, nearly all the
problems highlighted in the complaint concern Spanish and Korean. A survey
conducted at Flushing Hospital by Korean Community Services of
Metropolitan New York, for example, showed that 40 percent of patients
with limited English reported that they had received no interpreter
services, and 47 percent reported that the language assistance provided
was inadequate. A follow-up late last year found no improvement, the
complaint said.
The Queens and Brooklyn hospitals are part of the MediSys network.
Margaret M. Johnson, vice president and general counsel of MediSys,
insisted that its hospitals were in full compliance with federal and state
law and offered access to telephone translation for languages unknown to
staff members.
''We're very sensitive to these issues,'' she said, citing a letter she
sent to immigrant organizations last September that listed 73
Korean-speaking nurses, prayer services by Buddhist monks and free health
screenings at centers for the elderly as examples of ''commitment to
multicultural awareness.''
But the immigrant organizations said their surveys found pervasive
problems. Typical were cases like that of a woman who had to rely on her
English-speaking Korean cabdriver to translate a doctor's directions for
treating her 11-year-old son, or the woman who minimized her symptoms of
depression because the person translating was her 13-year-old son.
Among the cases cited was that of a Korean woman taken by ambulance to
Flushing Hospital Medical Center last year after being beaten in the head
with a brick in a street robbery. Doctors used 30 stitches for her head
wound, but when the woman, a 45-year-old manicurist, returned for
follow-up care a few days later, she was handed a piece of paper stating
in English that to be seen by a doctor she had to pay $95 and bring a
photo ID. The robbery had left her with neither.
''I felt helpless,'' said the woman, who works in a nail salon in Great
Neck, on Long Island, speaking by telephone through a translator on the
condition that she be identified only as Ms. N. ''I was crying at home.''
Seongho Kim, then a social worker with Korean Community Services, returned
with her to the hospital, where he pointed out that Ms. N.'s care would be
covered by the New York State Crime Victims Fund. Only then did an
employee agree to let her be seen by a Korean-speaking doctor, Mr. Kim
said. ''People are dying because of their language.''
The woman who was left sterile, who identified herself only as Nayeli,
said two emergency operations were performed without adequate
translation.
In her first visit to St. Vincent's, only her brother was available to
translate, which made her ''ashamed,'' she said, to discuss her treatment
with doctors. They apparently removed one Fallopian tube after finding
that an embryo was growing inside it, a dangerous condition known as an
ectopic pregnancy.
Nayeli, who cleans houses, said she was assured after that operation
that she and her husband would have no trouble conceiving in the future.
But seven months later a new pregnancy, also apparently ectopic, put her
back in the operating room, where her second Fallopian tube was removed,
leaving her sterile. ''Never at any time did I know they were going to
remove my tubes,'' she said.
In some cases, the monitors themselves witnessed the medical
consequences of communication failures. Ana Maria Archila, executive
director of the Latin American Integration Center, an immigrant rights and
social service agency, said she and two others overheard doctors at St.
Vincent's telling a construction worker, through his 7-year-old cousin,
that the worker needed an amputation.
''The child said, 'I'm not sure if they said foot or said toe,''' Ms.
Archila recalled. ''This worker, he was about to cry.''
The monitors later learned that it was the man's third trip to the
emergency room after a construction accident that had crushed his toe
weeks earlier. Unable to explain his symptoms in English, he reported, he
had been handled dismissively until he returned with his big toe blackened
by gangrene.
Later, after the toe was amputated, Ms. Archila added, he had to rely
on a patient in the next bed to translate the doctors' instructions for
postoperative care.
| [Photograph] |
| A young Staten Island woman said she was never
told that two emergency operations would leave her unable to bear
children. Her case is one of dozens cited in a complaint to be
submitted to the state attorney general. (Photo by Mary DiBiase
Blaich for The New York Times)(pg. B8) |
|