The
GOV.210
Comparative Urban Political Systems
Prof. Janice
Bockmeyer
Fall, 2006
T/Th, 3rd
period (
Office: Room
3253N, Tues. -
Tel:
(212)237-8196 E-mail: jbockmeyer@jjay.cuny.edu or jbockmeyer@aol.com
Course
Objectives:
This course will
explore urban politics, government and governance, using a comparative perspective. We will assess methods used for the study of
comparative urban politics, compare trends in urbanization, including the
growth and shrinkage of urban centers, examine the autonomy of city governments
in relation to national and provincial (or state) authorities and regional
associations, and analyze the impact of intergovernmental relations on city
decision making. Key local service
delivery and policy areas will also be examined. Students will be asked to access and compare local
politics and the decision making processes of both the formal structures of
local government and non governmental actors including political and other nonprofit
organizations, developers, investors and business interests that might be local
or global. Finally, students will be
asked to assess the value of the global city concept by studying the global
urban impacts of immigration, the mobility of capital investment, the influence
of transnational non-governmental organizations, and international terrorism
and crime. Students will consider who legitimate decision makers should be in a
local polity and what role remains for city inhabitants of increasingly global
cities.
Course
Requirements:
Students are
expected to participate actively in class discussions, write short assignments,
take a midterm and final exam, and submit a 12-15 page research paper on a
topic of their choice that is relevant to comparative urban politics and
approved by the instructor (see Research Project). Students are strongly encouraged to visit
office hours at least once during the semester to discuss their paper topic and
secure the instructor’s approval before beginning their research. Papers are due on November 28th. Late papers will be graded down by one-half
grade per day late (weekends excluded).
Grading is as follows: 15% class participation and short assignments,
25% mid-term, 30% research paper, 30% final exam.
Required Texts
(Available for purchase in the JJ Bookstore and on reserve):
Abrahamson,
M. Global Cities. 2004.
Denters,
B. & L. Rose. Eds. 2005. Comparing
Local Governance: Trends and Developments.
Macmillan.
LeGates,
R. & F. Stout. Eds. 2003. The City
Reader. 3rd Edition.
Mehta, S. 2004.
Additional
Resources: Below are some additional resources in comparative urban politics that
may be helpful to students in their individual research assignments and in
classroom discussions:
Beauregard,
R.A. & S. Body-Gendrot. Eds. 1999. The
Urban Moment: Cosmopolitan Essays on the Late-
20th-Century City.
Bockmeyer,
J.L. 2006. Culture of walls: Checkpoints and Passageways for Immigrant
Berliners.
In G. Lenz et al. Eds. Toward a New Metropolitanism.
Bockmeyer,
J.L. 2003. Devolution and the Transformation of Community Housing Activism.
The Social Science Journal 40: 175-188.
Body-Gendrot,
S. 2000.
The Social Control of Cities? A Comparative Perspective.
DiGaetano,
A. & J. Klemanski. 1999. Power and
City Governance.
Univ. Press.
Goetz,
E. G. & S. E. Clarke. Eds. 1993. The
New Localism: Comparative Urban Politics in a Global
Era. Newburg Park, Calf.: Sage.
Hambleton,
R., H. Savitch & M. Stewart. Eds.2002. Globalism
and Local Democracy:
Challenge and Change in
John, P. 2001. Local Governance in
Neuwirth, R. 2005. Shadow Cities: A
Billion Squatters, A New Urban World.
Paddison,
R. Ed. 2001. Handbook of Urban Studies.
Parker, S. 2004. Urban Theory and
the Urban Experience: Encountering the City.
Routledge.
Pierre, J. 2005. Comparative Urban Governance: Uncovering Complex
Causalities. Urban Affairs Review,
Vol. 40, No. 4, March,
pp. 446-462.
Polèse, M. & R. Stren. Eds. 2000. The
Social Sustainability of Cities: Diversity and the
Management of Change.
Sassen,
S. 2006. Cities in a World Economy. 3rd
Ed.
Sassen,
S. 2002. Ed. Global Networks, Linked
Cities.
Savitch,
H. 2001. Does Terror Have an Urban
Future? Urban Studies, 38: 2515-2533.
Savitch,
H. & P. Kantor. 2002. Cities in the
International Marketplace: The Political Economy
of Urban Development in
Press.
Savitch
N. & P. Kantor. 2003. Urban Strategies for a Global Era: A Cross-National
Comparison. American Behavioral
Scientist 46 (8): 1002-1033.
Smith,
M.P. & L.E. Guarnizo. Eds.
1998. Transnationalism from Below.
NewBrunswick: Transaction Publisher.
Vale,
L & T. Campanella. Eds. 2005. The
Resilient City: How Modern Cities Recover from Disaster.
Wolman,
H. & M. Goldsmith. 1992. Urban
Politics & Policy: A Comparative Approach.
Internet Resources:
Working in the
field of comparative urban studies will require us to reach well beyond the
data and resources available in
________________________________________________________________________
Thurs.,
Aug. 31 Defining the “city”
Read: Mumford, “What Is a City?” in The City Reader, pp.92-96
Wirth, “Urbanism as a Way of Life,” in The City
Reader, pp.97-104
Kitto, “The Polis” City Reader, pp. 44-48
Mehta,
Maximum City, “Personal Geography,” pp.3-38:
Begin reading Mehta to
prepare for Assignment #1 which will be distributed on Sept. 7. As you read
consider how Mehta defines “home.” Why do Mehta’s parents move their
family to NYC? Why does
he, as an adult, leave NYC for
Sept.
5, 7 Urban political theory
and comparing cities
Read: Pierre, “Comparative Urban Governance,” UAR, vol. 40, No.
4, March 2005, pp.446-462.
LeGates, “How to Study Cities,” City Reader,
pp. 9-18.
Mollenkopf,
“How to Study Urban Political Power,” City Reader, pp. 236-243.
Denters & Rose, “Local Governance in the Third
Millennium,” Comparing Local
Governance,
Chapt. 1.
Sept
12, 14 Urban political economy
in a global context
Read: Abrahamson, Chapts. 1, 4, 8
Sassen, “The Impact of the New Technologies and
Globalization on Cities,”
City Reader, pp.214-220
Sept.
19, 21 The urbanization process
Read: Champion, “Urbanization, Suburbanization, Counterurbanization and
Reurbanization,” in
Paddison, Chapt. 9 (on reserve)
Abrahamson, Chapt. 2
Fishman, “Beyond Suburbia,” in City Reader,
pp. 78-85.
Burgess, “The Growth of the City,” pp. 157-163
Sept.
26, 28 Intergovernmental relations and the purposes of local
government
Read: Borraz & Le Galès, “
Bobbio,
“
Savitch & Vogel, “The
Thurs.,
Oct. 5 (no class Tues., Oct. 3) Local
government and social policy
Read: Rose & Ståhlberg,
“The Nordic Countries: Still the ‘Promised Land’? – Denter & Rose, 6
Macgregor,
“Social Policy and the City,” in Paddison, Chapt. 23 (on reserve)
Oct. 10, 12 Comparing structures for
urban government
Read: Goldsmith, “A New Intergovernmentalism? Denters & Rose, 14
Denters & Rose, “Towards Local Governance?” in
Denters & Rose, 15
Oct
17, 19 Government or
governance? The New Public Management
Read: Denters & Klok,
“The
Gabriel &
Eisenmann, “
Ladner, “
Tues., Oct. 24 – Midterm
Exam
Thurs., Oct 26: Urban politics: Why we participate (or not)
Read: Putnam,
“Bowling Alone,” in City Reader, pp. 106-113
Arnstein, “A Ladder of Citizen Participation,” in City
Reader, pp.245-255
Mehta, “Powertoni,” pp. 39-77
Bockmeyer, “Devolution and the Transformation of Community
Housing Activism.
(SSJ article on reserve)
Wolman & Goldsmith, “Citizen Preferences and
Urban Politics,” Chapt. 7 (on reserve)
Oct.
31, Nov. 2 Who are urban citizens? Immigrants, transnational organizations, and
participation by non-citizen
residents
Read: Martinotti, “A City for Whom? Transients and Public Life in the
Second-
Generation Metropolis, in Beauregard & Body-Gendrot.
-8 (on reserve).
Bockmeyer, “Culture of Walls” (on reserve)
Schiller & Fouron, “Transnational Lives and
National Identities: The Identity
Politics of Haitian Immigrants” in
Smith and Guarnizo, Chapt. 5 (on reserve)
Nov.
7, 9 The
politics of urban economic development and regionalism
Read:
Sorkin, “The Center Cannot Hold,” City Reader,
pp. 292-295
Savitch & Kantor, “Urban Strategies for a Global
Era,” (ABS).
Nov 14, 16 Can We Build A Sustainable and ‘
Read: Beatley,
“Green Urbanism…” in City Reader, pp. 401-408
Wheeler, “Planning Sustainable and Livable Cities,”
pp. 487-496
Stren & Polèse, “Understanding the New
Sociocultural Dynamics of
Cities: Comparative Urban Policy in a
Global Context. In Stren &
Polèse, Chapt. 1
da Silva, “
Urban Housing Policy,” in Polese
& Stren, Chapt.8
Tues.,
Nov. 21 (No Thurs. class – Thanksgiving)
The politics of city planning:
Planning for whom?
Read: Hayden, “What Would a
Forester,
“Planning in the Face of Conflict,” City
Reader, pp.376-387
Davidoff,
“Advocacy and Pluralism in Planning,” City
Reader, pp. 389-397
Nov. 28*, 30 Urban
crime and policing in global cities [*Nov.
28 – Term Papers Due]
Read:
Wilson & Kelling, “Broken Windows,”
City Reader, pp. 268-276
Mehta,
Dec. 5, 7 The future of cities: Can we learn from
destruction?
Read: Savitch, “Does
Terror Have an Urban Future?” Urban Studies
Hein, “Resilient
in
The Resilient City, pp. 213-234(on reserve)
Dec. 12 (Last Class) The Politics of Cities in the
Global Context: Summary and Review Session
Final
Exam, Tuesday, December 19,
The Semester Research Project
INTRODUCTION: This semester you are asked to
execute a project of your own design in which you develop a hypothesis that is
relevant to comparative urban politics, and test it using comparative,
cross-national urban research. Below is an outline of the key steps to
developing and testing a two variable hypothesis. This outline is intended to guide
you through the basic stages of doing research and presenting it in a paper.
Remember that you must receive my approval for your paper topic, or hypothesis,
before beginning your project. You may visit office hours for feedback or
guidance, or write the instructor by email (jbockmeyer@jjay.cuny.edu or jbockmeyer@aol.com) and secure written
feedback and approval.
THE
ASSIGNMENT: Students will choose a research question of interest, shape the question
into a two-variable hypothesis (see below), and test the hypothesis using
qualitative or quantitative methods. Students may use all CUNY and NYPL library
resources and/or any archives or private collections, as well as internet
sources. Minimum Requirements: The project must test the hypothesis by
comparing at least two cities located in two different nations. Students will
make use of no fewer than 8 primary sources.
Sources will be cited in endnotes, footnotes or parenthetical citations. In
addition, all papers must include a bibliography listing all sources used. Any
appropriate style guide may be used, including MLA, APA.
STAGES IN THE RESEARCH PROJECT:
Stage
One: Pose a problem in the form of a question. Begin your project with a central question
that is interesting to you, relevant to the class, and significant to our
understanding of comparative urban politics.
Examples: What determines whether city inhabitants will have a
significant role in local economic development decisions? What determines
whether cities plan well for shrinkage and growth? What determines whether
cities provide subsidized affordable housing? As part of this stage we conduct
an initial literature review, or a review of the articles and books
written about our topic. This helps us
develop expectations about the main variables having an effect on our area of
concern.
Stage
Two: State a hypothesis. Hypotheses
move your research project forward by suggesting a concrete answer to your
question that can be tested. The
hypothesis is a presumption, in other words, used for testing that can then be
proved or disproved. In this class we will be using the two variable hypothesis
built by posing a relationship between a dependent and independent
variable. The dependent variable is the
one we wish to explain--for example, the role played by residents in economic
development decisions. The independent variable is the one that we have a hunch
can best explain it, for example, the relative economic health of the city. If
we think we have identified a possible cause of our dependent variable, then we
can pose a relationship and state the hypothesis: I hypothesize that strong local economic health heightens the role
played by local residents in economic development decision making. Our goal is not, in other words, to prove
that our hunch is correct, but to have an assumed cause (independent
variable) and effect (dependent variable) in place, as well as the assumed
relationship between them, that can then structure our examination. Try to be objective throughout your research
project. Remember that we may, in fact, disprove our hypothesis by the end of
our project.
Stage
Three: Develop the research design.
Design is a fancy way of saying that we next need to find the best way
to test our hypothesis. This means deciding how best to measure our two variables.
Taking the sample hypothesis used above, to measure our independent variable we
may want to examine the decision making role of residents in different cities
with a range of economic conditions from strong to weak. But how will we
measure the dependent variable, the decison making
role of residents? Here we may decide to review data (articles, books, news
accounts, archival materials) on the process of major urban development
projects and look for indications that residents had strong influence. We may
decide to rank the relative strength of residents’ role in decision making. Going
through the design stage helps us narrow down our research task--we cannot
study all cities or all development projects in our cities of interest--while
staying focused on our hypothesis.
Stage
Four: Collect data. We next go to the
library to collect the necessary books, articles, statistics, (some projects
may require census or other data) needed to measure our variables and test our
hypothesis. This will also mean conducting an internet search, and/or going to
an archive to use historical materials to construct case studies of an event(s).
When using the internet, remember that the internet takes the researcher to an
address or source, but does not tell us the quality of the source. Just as
works found in a library might be weak or strong, appropriate for your topic or
inappropriate, sources found on the internet are also of varying quality. It is
up to the student to choose strong and appropriate sources.
Stage Five: Data analysis. Now we need to review our data very carefully
and start to assess what it is telling us.
Back to our example, what pattern do we see across our cities? Do our findings about residents’ influence
and economically healthy cities seem to fit our expectations? Do some of our
cases take us by surprise? Here we need
to put our biases aside and try to analyze what the data tells us about our
presumption that, in this case, cities with fiscal woes will probably not give
local residents much input. Is our dependent variable caused by our independent
variable? If most cases seem to fit, but one is extraordinary in comparison, we
may have to do a bit more research to find out if there were any extraordinary (spurious) factors having an effect. We
may find that the cases did not follow the pattern we expected. Remember that
it is as ‘correct’ to reject the hypothesis as it is to ‘prove’ it. We are only testing the validity of the
hypothesis; we are not setting out to prove it.
Stage
Six: Draw conclusions. Now it is time to draw some conclusions. In
the final analysis, was the hypothesis correct or incorrect? More importantly, did you find any
relationship between your two variables? How strong was the relationship? Here it is most important not to overstate your
findings. We may have found a weak relationship between variables. We need to mention the weaknesses in the
relationship, point to where our research demonstrated some expected findings
and some that our hypothesis did not predict. We also need to acknowledge any
weaknesses in our project design (perhaps the cities chosen were not
appropriate; maybe a study with more cases would have produced different
results, etc. What, in the final analysis do our findings tell us about the
importance of economic health to the possible influence of local inhabitants in
development decisions that will effect the whole city? Is it harder for
residents to play a role under certain economic conditions? What wider
significance might this have? Will our findings point to some ways that city
residents might heighten their “voice” in deliberations? We might point out in
the conclusions if our findings are useful to citizens and other decision
makers. We might also want to point to what factors might be explored in our
next research project.
One final point should be made. When we write up the paper, we need to cite,
or refer to, all of the sources we used in our analysis, the sources of our
data and any ideas that were not our own. I would recommend that for this you
consult a style guide, such as MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers
(most recent edition), available in most bookstores, or the APA Guide,
or A Pocket Style Manual (Diana
Hacker). A summary of APA is also available in the John Jay library and