ÿWPCu ²-½X‰‘ùõ£Í f×i)FIƤ=µÎæÀõ‡†€¶V“ó!5ŽŒäÝ:øš’õ/Ëå’, *Ü<÷ô¯/¸ö·5¥ôA7Í1¤Q“›"õìIž 4YsìzP ¶DJ°(3ˆÓ±=<Ó%7µÊÆbrÀc5ö2'.^OçOECp—uBôéú<®¤ºà9 ]wíTÊlz œ%ëìÂqŸ/S,m‰oÆà À1Þ#À£êó_6ÍW~quäëiMÖ!›Ì ¾ˆÚrÿë5awØzâÝ•€“i ’˜ÔT=Pè<Ú‡î‹Hþ%ÖÁî8•]Ŷ&í»n¨ˆã„—¦Çogqññp^±Hlí›öÇw‘È{b-ym‚-V¼u;†©5o\Ù&€u7­;ÚToj»‡#Bˆì_¥uØK¸²¹„ušÛ4È!å*÷XƒPëMÁÕ¤±ØœqdÞˆ*=?—³pf €·6®ñAÝTHoD{!áQ÷¼ ¬eZz)ùUÉx//“í±„À"¿Cºž›¥Þg¥©[‰+Vüƒj$lðŠ ŽF óÊ?„ò y˜š²Ö¬ t dIµ ϸÅV€í‹™uÔ­(]i퟼“ˆÎôd…µš/Ÿ^3¹Wb(Á#!^UN %Í 0(Ó^ ûw@4G[j mlll 0ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 0³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³³ 0ã 0 2C˜HP LaserJet 4 Plus,ð,,,,,ð0(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman RegularX($¡¡œD,á NOEPQERSETUEVWE¬‘+ „3|xWÿU‹ÿÀÀÀDocument0zzSDUNumber2Document1zzSDUNumber2Document2zzSDUNumber2Document2zzSDUNumber3Document1zzSDUNumber42Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  ÝÔ_ÔThese€are€instructions€which€have€been€given€to€you,€the€juror,€bñFññCñuñCññFññGñy€the€judgeñGññHññGñs€ñGññHññIñ€in€this€case.€€YouÏshould€read€these€carefully€beñIññJññIñofñIññJññKñfore€rendering€your€verñKññLññKñiñKññLññMñdict.ñMññDññCñt€ñCññDññFññEñy€ñEññEñthñEññFññDññCñthe€ñCññDñò òÐ œì ÐÌÓ  ÓJURY€INSTRUCTIONSó ó€(these€are€the€ð ðstandardðð€instructions)Ð tÄ ÐÓ¬ÓÌDUTY€OF€THE€JURY€TO€FIND€FACTS€AND€FOLLOW€LAWÌÌ€€€€It€is€your€duty€to€find€the€facts€from€all€the€evidence€admitted€in€this€case.€To€those€facts€youÏmust€apply€the€law€as€I€give€it€to€you.€The€determination€of€the€law€is€my€duty€as€the€presidingÏjudge€in€this€court.€It€is€your€duty€to€apply€the€law€exactly€as€I€give€it€to€you,€whether€you€agreeÏwith€it€or€not.€You€must€not€be€influenced€by€any€personal€likes€or€dislikes,€prejudices€orÏsympathy.€That€means€that€you€must€decide€the€case€solely€on€the€evidence€before€you€andÏaccording€to€the€law.€You€will€recall€that€you€took€an€oath€promising€to€do€so€at€the€beginning€ofÏthe€case.€Ì€€€€In€following€my€instructions,€you€must€follow€all€of€them€and€not€single€out€some€and€ignoreÏothers;€they€are€all€equally€important.€You€must€not€read€into€these€instructions,€or€into€anythingÏI€may€have€said€or€done,€any€suggestions€by€me€as€to€what€verdict€you€should€return--that€is€aÏmatter€entirely€for€you€to€decide.ÌÌÌPRESUMPTION€OF€INNOCENCE--BURDEN€OF€PROOF--REASONABLE€DOUBTÌÌ€€€€(1)€As€you€know,€the€defendant€has€pleaded€not€guilty€to€the€crime€charged€in€the€indictment.ÏThe€indictment€is€not€any€evidence€at€all€of€guilt.€It€is€just€the€formal€way€that€the€governmentÏtells€the€defendant€what€crime€he€is€accused€of€committing.€It€does€not€even€raise€any€suspicionÏof€guilt.€Ì€€€€(2)€Instead,€the€defendant€starts€the€trial€with€a€clean€slate,€with€no€evidence€at€all€against€him,Ïand€the€law€presumes€that€he€is€innocent.€This€presumption€of€innocence€stays€with€him€unlessÏthe€government€presents€Ô% € Ôevidence€here€in€court€that€overcomes€the€presumption,€and€convincesÏyou€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt€that€he€is€guilty.€Ì€€€€(3)€This€means€that€the€defendant€has€no€obligation€to€present€any€evidence€at€all,€or€to€proveÏto€you€in€any€way€that€he€is€innocent.€It€is€up€to€the€government€to€prove€that€he€is€guilty,€and€thisÏburden€stays€on€the€government€from€start€to€finish.€You€must€find€the€defendant€not€guiltyÏunless€the€government€convinces€you€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt€that€he€is€guilty.€Ì€€€€(4)€The€government€must€prove€every€element€of€the€crime€charged€beyond€a€reasonableÏdoubt.€Proof€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt€does€not€mean€proof€beyond€all€possible€doubt.€PossibleÏdoubts€or€doubts€based€purely€on€speculation€are€not€reasonable€doubts.€A€reasonable€doubt€is€aÏdoubt€based€on€reason€and€common€sense.€It€may€arise€from€the€evidence,€the€lack€of€evidence,Ïor€the€nature€of€the€evidence.€Ì€€€€(5)€Proof€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt€means€proof€which€is€so€convincing€that€you€would€notÏhesitate€to€rely€and€act€on€it€in€making€the€most€important€decisions€in€your€own€lives.€If€you€areÏconvinced€that€the€government€has€proved€the€defendant€guilty€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt,€say€soÏby€returning€a€guilty€verdict.€If€you€are€not€convinced,€say€so€by€returning€a€not€guilty€verdict.ÌÌÐ D-”(, ÐROBBERY€IN€THE€FIRST€DEGREE€„€DEFINITIONÌÌñUñà  àñUññVñ€€€ñVññWññVñ€ñVññWññVññVññNñThe€defendantñNññOññNñ€ñNññOññPñ,€JohñPññQññPñmnñPññQññRñn€TrentñRññSññRñ€ñRññSññTñ,€is€charged€with€robbery€in€the€first€degree.€€ñTññOññNñis€ñNññOñA€person€commits€theÏcrime€of€robbery€in€the€first€degree€when€in€the€commission€of€a€robbery€he€or€she€is€armed€Ô% €! ÔwithÏa€deadly€weapon€or€displays€what€appears€to€be€a€firearm€or€other€deadly€weapon.€€DeadlyÏweapon€means€any€firearm,€whether€loaded€or€unloaded,€Ô% € Ôwhich€under€the€circumstances€in€whichÏit€is€used,€attempted€to€be€used,€or€threatened€to€be€used,€is€readily€capable€of€causing€death€orÏsubstantial€bodily€injury.ÌÌÌCREDIBILITY€OF€WITNESSESÌÌ€€You,€as€jurors,€are€the€sole€and€exclusive€judges€of€the€credibility€of€each€of€the€witnessesÏcalled€to€testify€in€this€case€and€only€you€determine€the€importance€or€the€weight€that€theirÏtestimony€deserves.€After€making€your€assessment€concerning€the€credibility€of€a€witness,€youÏmay€decide€to€believe€Ô% €£ Ôall€of€that€witness'€testimony,€only€a€portion€of€it,€or€none€of€it.ÌÌ€€In€making€your€assessment€of€that€witness€you€should€carefully€scrutinize€all€of€the€testimonyÏgiven€by€that€witness,€the€circumstances€under€which€each€witness€has€testified,€and€all€of€theÏother€evidence€which€tends€to€show€whether€a€witness,€in€your€opinion,€is€worthy€of€belief.ÏConsider€each€witness's€intelligence,€motive€to€falsify,€state€of€mind,€and€appearance€and€mannerÏwhile€on€the€witness€stand.€Consider€the€witness's€ability€to€observe€the€matters€as€to€which€he€orÏshe€has€testified€and€consider€whether€he€or€she€impresses€you€as€having€an€accurate€memory€orÏrecollection€of€these€matters.€Consider€also€any€relation€a€witness€may€bear€to€either€side€of€theÏcase,€the€manner€in€which€each€witness€might€be€affected€by€your€verdict,€and€the€extent€toÏwhich,€if€at€all,€each€witness€is€either€supported€or€contradicted€by€other€evidence€in€the€case.ÌÌ€€Inconsistencies€or€discrepancies€in€the€testimony€of€a€witness€or€between€the€testimony€ofÏdifferent€witnesses€may€or€may€not€cause€you€to€disbelieve€or€discredit€such€testimony.€Two€orÏmore€persons€witnessing€an€incident€or€a€transaction€may€simply€see€or€hear€it€differently.ÏInnocent€Ô_ÔmisrecollectionÔ_Ô,€like€failure€of€recollection,€is€not€an€uncommon€human€experience.€InÏweighing€the€effect€of€a€discrepancy,€however,€always€consider€whether€it€pertains€to€a€matter€ofÏimportance€or€an€insignificant€detail€and€consider€whether€the€Ô% €¤ Ôdiscrepancy€results€from€innocentÏerror€or€from€intentional€falsehood.ÌÌ€€After€making€your€own€judgment€or€assessment€concerning€the€believability€of€a€witness,€youÏcan€then€attach€such€importance€or€weight€to€that€testimony,€if€any,€that€you€feel€it€deserves.€YouÏwill€then€be€in€a€position€to€decide€whether€the€government€has€proven€the€Ô_Ôcharge[sÔ_Ô]€beyond€aÏreasonable€doubt.