|
|
Full Curriculum Vita (
in PDF format)
(NOTE: Acrobat.PDF file viewer available at:
http://www.adobe.com]
RECENT PUBLICATIONS on eyewitness reliability, expert evidence, pretrial publicity and change of venue
NOTE: for (p)reprints you can download the highlighted references in
adobe.pdf format. BUT--in the interest of keeping copyrights protected, the
files are "locked"--simply email Steve at 
[spenrod@jjay.cuny.edu] for the "key". Please email if you see a
broken link.
Groscup, J. & Penrod, S. D. (In press). Appellate Review and
Eyewitness Experts. In Brian Cutler (Ed.). Expert Testimony on Eyewitness
Issues.
Penrod, S. & Kovera, M. B. Recent developments in North American
identification science and practice. To appear in: Williamson, T., Bull, R.
& Valentine, T. (Eds.). Handbook of Psychology of Investigative
Interviewing. Current Developments and Future Directions.
Penrod, S. & Kurosawa, K. (2008). Eyewitness errors: Assessing their
extent, causes, and solutions. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 7, 36-62.
Bornstein,
B. H. & Penrod, S.D. (2008). Hugo Who? G.F. Arnold’s Alternative Early
Approach to Psychology and Law. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22,
759-768.
Deffenbacher, K. A.; Bornstein, B. H.; McGorty, K. & Penrod, S. D.
(2008). Forgetting the Once-Seen Face: Estimating the Strength of an
Eyewitness’s Memory Representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Applied, 14, 139-150.
Heuer, L., Penrod, S., & Kattan, A. (2007). The
role of societal benefits and fairness concerns among decision makers and
decision recipients. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 573-610.
Penrod, S. D. & Bornstein, B. H. (2007). Generalizing Eyewitness Reliability
Research. In R.C.L. Lindsay, D. Ross, D Read & M. Toglia, (Eds.), Handbook
of eyewitness psychology (Vol. II): Memory for people.
Van Wallendael, L.R., Devenport, J., Cutler, B.L. & Penrod, S.
2007). Mistaken Identification=Erroneous Convictions? Assessing
and Improving Legal Safeguards. In R.C.L. Lindsay, D. Ross, D Read
& M. Toglia, (Eds.), Handbook of eyewitness psychology (Vol. II): Memory
for people.
Wells, G. L., Memon, A. & Penrod, S. D.
(2006). Eyewitness Evidence: Improving its Probative Value.
Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7, 45-75.
Deffenbacher, K. A.; Bornstein, B. H.;
& Penrod, S. D. (2006). Mugshot exposure effects: retroactive
interference, mugshot commitment, source confusion, and unconscious
transference. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 287-307.
Robbennolt, J., Groscup, J. & Penrod,
S. & Heuer, L. (2005). Evaluating and Assisting Jury Competence in
Civil and Criminal Cases. In
Studebaker, C. A. & Penrod, S. D.
(2005). Pretrial Publicity and Its Influence on Juror Decision
Making. In N. Brewer & K. D. Williams, Psychology and Law: An
Empirical Perspective.
Penrod, S. (2005). Eyewitnesses. In L. E. Sullivan & M. S. Rosen (Eds.). Encyclopedia
of Law Enforcement, Vol. 1.
Penrod, S. (2005). Lineups. In L. E. Sullivan & M. S. Rosen (Eds.). Encyclopedia
of Law Enforcement, Vol. 1.
Deffenbacher, K. A.; Bornstein, B. H.;
Penrod, S. D. & McGorty, K. (2004). A Meta-Analytic Review
of the Effects of High Stress on Eyewitness Memory. Law and Human
Behavior, 28, 687-706.
The Nature and Scope of the Problem of Sexual Abuse of Minors by Catholic
Priests and Deacons in the
Hollin, C., van Koppen, P., Penrod, S. (2004). Editorial. Psychology, Crime
& Law.,10, 1-3.
Groscup, J.L.
& Penrod, S. D. (2003).
O'Neil, K.M.,
Penrod, S. D., & Bornstein, B. H. (2003). Web-based
Research: Methodological Variables' Effects on Dropout and Sample
Characteristics. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and
Computers, 35. 217-236.
Penrod, S.
(2003). Eyewitness Identification Evidence: How Well Are Witnesses and
Police Performing? Criminal Justice Magazine, Spring, 36-47, 54.
McAuliff, B.
D., Nemeth, R. J., Bornstein, B. H., Penrod, S.D. (2003). Juror Decision-Making
in the 21st Century: Confronting Science and Technology in Court. In D.
Carson & R. Bull (Eds.), Handbook
of psychology in legal contexts (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Heuer, L.,
Penrod, S. Hafer, C. & Cohn, I. (2002). The role of resource and
relational concerns for procedural justice. Personality and Social
Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1468-1482.
Groscup,
J., Penrod, S., Studebaker, C., Huss, M., & O’Neil, K. (2002).
The Effects of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals on the Admissibility of
Expert Testimony in State and Federal Criminal Cases. Psychology, Public
Policy & Law, 8, 339-372.
van
Koppen, P.J., & Penrod, S.D. (Eds.). (2002). Adversarial versus
inquisitorial justice: Psychological perspectives on criminal justice systems. New
York: Plenum.
van
Koppen, P.J., & Penrod, S.D. (2002). Adversarial or Inquisitorial:
Comparing Systems. In van Koppen, P.J., & Penrod, S.D.
(Eds.). Adversarial versus inquisitorial justice: Psychological
perspectives on criminal justice systems. New York: Plenum.
van
Koppen, P.J., & Penrod, S.D. (2002). The John Wayne and Judge Dee
Versions of Justice. In van Koppen, P.J., & Penrod, S.D. (Eds.). Adversarial
versus inquisitorial justice: Psychological perspectives on criminal justice
systems. New York: Plenum.
Stolle,
D. P, Robbennolt, J. K, Patry, M. & Penrod, S.D. (2002).
Fractional Factorial Designs for Legal Psychology. Behavioral Sciences
and Law, 20, 5-17
Greene,
E., Chopra, S., Kovera, M. B., Penrod, S., Rose, V. G., Schuller, R., &
Studebaker, C. (2002). Jurors and juries: A review of the
field. In J. R. P. Ogloff, Ed. Taking Psychology and Law into the
Twenty First Century. New York: Kluwer.
Studebaker,
C. A., Robbennolt, J. K., Penrod, S. D., Pathak-Sharma, M. K., Groscup, J. L.
and Devenport, J. L. (2002). Studying Pretrial Publicity Effects: New
Methods for Testing and Improving External Validity. Law and Human Behavior,
26, 19-41.
O'Neil,
K. M.; Penrod, S. D. (2001). Methodological variables in Web-based research
that may affect results: Sample type, monetary incentives, and personal information.
Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers. 33, 226-233.
Studebaker,
C. A., Robbennolt, J. K., Pathak-Sharma, M. K., & Penrod S. D.
(2000). Assessing Pretrial Publicity Effects: Integrating Content Analytic
Results. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 317-336.
Vidmar,
N., et al. (2000). Amicus brief: Kumho Tire v.
Carmichael. Law & Human Behavior. 24, 387-400
Penrod,
S. & Cutler, B.L. (1999). The case against traditional safeguards:
Preventing mistaken convictions in eyewitness identification trials. .R. Roesch
& S. Hart, Psychology and Law: State of the Discipline. Plenum: New
York.
Studebaker,
C., Devenport, J. & Penrod, S. (1999). Perspectives on jury
decisionmaking: Cases with pretrial publicity and cases based on eyewitness
identifications. In F. Durso (ed.), Handbook of Law and Psychology. New
York: Wiley.
Wells,
G.L., Small. M., Penrod, S., Malpass, R. S., Fulero, S. M. & Brimacombe, C.
A. E. (1999). Eyewitness identification procedures: Recommendations for
lineups and photospreads. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 603-647.
Robbennolt,
J., Penrod, S. & Heuer, L. (1999). Assessing and aiding jury
competence. In A. Hess & I. Weiner (eds.), Handbook of Forensic
Psychology (2nd Ed.). New York: Wiley.
Penrod,
S. & Heuer, L.B. (1998). Improving group performance: The case of the
jury. In R. S. Tindale, L. Heath, J. Edwards, E. J. Posavac, F. B. Bryant, Y.
Suarez-Balacazar, E. Henderson-King & J. Meyers, Theory and Research on
Small Groups. New York: Plenum.
Dexter, H.R.,
Penrod, S. D., & Saunders, D. (1997). Attributing responsibility to
female victims after exposure to sexually violent films. Journal of Applied
Social Psychology, 27, 2149.
Penrod,
S. & Heuer, L.B. (1997). Tweaking Commonsense: Assessing Aids to Jury
Decision Making. Psychology, Public Policy & Law, 3, 259-284.
Devenport,
J. L., Penrod, S. D., & Cutler, B. L. (1997). Eyewitness identification
evidence: Evaluating commonsense evaluations. Psychology, Public Policy
& Law, 3, 338-361.
Studebaker,
C. A & Penrod, S. D. (1997). Pretrial publicity: The media, the law and
common sense. Psychology, Public Policy & Law, 3, 428-460.
Krafka,
C., Linz, D., Donnerstein, E., & Penrod, S. (1997). Women's reactions
to sexually aggressive mass media depictions. Violence Against Women, 3,
149-181.
Kovera,
M., Penrod, S. D., Pappas, C. Thill, D. (1997). Identification of
computer-generated facial composites. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82,
235-246.
Heuer,
L.B. & Penrod, S. (1996). Increasing juror participation in trials
through notetaking and question asking. Judicature, 79. 256-262.
Smith,
B., Penrod, S.D., Park, R., & Otto, A. (1996). Jurors' use of
probabilistic evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 20. 49-82.
Narby,
D.J., Cutler, B.L., & Penrod, S. (1996). The effects of witness,
target, and situational factors on eyewitness identifications. In Sporer,
S.L., Malpass, R. & Koehnken, G. (Eds.). Psychological Issues in
Eyewitness Identification. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Penrod,
S.D., Fulero, S. & Cutler, B. (1995). Expert psychological testimony on
eyewitness reliability before and after Daubert. Behavioral Sciences and the
Law 13, 229-260.
Penrod,
S. & Cutler, B. (1995). Witness confidence and witness accuracy:
Assessing their forensic relation. Psychology, Public Policy & Law &
, 1, 817-845.
Sporer,
S., Penrod, S.D., Read, D. & Cutler, B.L. (1995). Gaining confidence in
confidence: A new meta-analysis on the confidence-accuracy relationship in
eyewitness identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 315-327.
Cutler, B.L. &
Penrod, S.D. (1995). Mistaken identifications: The eyewitness,
psychology, and law. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Heuer,
L.B. & Penrod, S. (1995). Jury decisionmaking in complex trials. In R.
Bull & D. Carson (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology in Legal Contexts.
Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Cutler,
B.L. & Penrod, S. (1995). Assessing the accuracy of eyewitness
identifications. In R.
Bull & D. Carson (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology in Legal Contexts.
Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Penrod,
S.D., Fulero, S. & Cutler, B. (1995). Expert psychological testimony in the
United States: A new playing field? European Journal of Psychological
Assessment, 11, 65-72.